Everything is a Remix (Original Series)

925K views · 10 years ago · essay · evergreen

Kirby Ferguson's video series argues that creative work is built by copying, transforming and combining existing ideas, with examples from music, film and technology. It also criticizes how copyright and patent law treat that process.

HN treats it as the best explanation of how creativity actually works, for example when discussing copying in design, generative art and AI.

“The best explanation of creativity that I have found is a video series by Kirby Ferguson called Everything Is a Remix”

29 comments from Hacker News

i
@indiv02024 · in “Copying is the way design works (2020)”
Reminds me of one of my favourite video essays -- "Everything is a Remix" [0]. The video and this article cover the same ideas albeit with different examples. Which is funny on a meta level -- the article could be called a remix of the video. The video (if I recall correctly) goes a bit further, attacking patents/IP law as anti-creative. [0]: ▶ this video
Strongly recommendsView on HN
c
@combatentropy2022 · in “Copyright doesn't need 95 years to get the job done”
I find that most people don't understand creativity. If you believe an artist or inventor is some mystic sage who creates works ex nihilo, then you misunderstand creativity and attribute to it far too much. And therefore you might grant an artist a period of copyright that is longer than is really deserved or needed. Through much of my life, I have been accused of being "creative". In elementary school my class recognized me as the best at drawing. In fifth grade I wrote a book that was checked out so many times from the school library that it filled up the check-out card front and back. In high school, I made dozens of little movies with my friends. After college I was a graphic designer, and both of my employers expressed awe at my work. The best explanation of creativity that I have found is a video series by Kirby Ferguson called Everything Is a Remix, ▶ this video It shows what I always knew in the back of my head: that nothing I ever made was from staring at a blank sheet of paper. It was just me ripping off all my favorite things I had seen before. Everyone tries their hand at art, and often it obviously is a copy. My secret was that I would take a little of this, a little of that, copy 5 different things and mix them all together, rather than making a straight copy of just one thing. I wasn't trying to hide anything, it was just how my mind naturally worked. I thought one thing from one movie was cool, so I took part of that. I thought something else from a drawing was cool, so I took some of that. Then I merged it all together, naturally, without really thinking about what I was doing, just trying to make something cool. Then I saw that video and realized that is what pretty much everyone had been doing, no matter how famous. A great artist is not someone who creates stuff out of nothing. More like someone who comes up with a new recipe based on five previous recipes. I'm sure they deserve something, just not everything, foreverz!
Strongly recommendsView on HN
a
@alexpotato2026 · in “What heraldry and Japanese mon can teach about visual-identity generators”
I love this for several reasons: 1. LLMs building tools that can be run by either LLMs or humans are a great idea 2. Generative art sometimes feels like "art by machine" but humans create art and logos in very similar ways e.g. start with "the rules" and then use that to create the art Also, someone generally pops up in these discussions about "how this is not being creative" etc. To that I point people to the Everything Is A Remix series: - ▶ this video (2016) - link (updated for 2023)
RecommendsView on HN
a
@alexpotato2026 · in “Patterns and problems in emerging multi-agent systems”
I would highly recommend the "Everything is a Remix" series on YouTube to show how a lot of "creative" work is really just combining different items. ▶ this video
RecommendsView on HN
r
@rmbyrro2024 · in “Sora: Creating video from text”
I used to have the same view. Watching "Everything is a Remix" [1] helped me broaden my perspective. [1] ▶ this video
RecommendsView on HN
r
@rmbyrro2023 · in “More writers sue OpenAI for copyright infringement over AI training”
You might find this documentary interesting: "Everything Is A Remix" [1] [1] ▶ this video
RecommendsView on HN
h
@haunter2022 · in “Stable Diffusion macOS native app”
'Everything is a Remix' is made for you ▶ this video
RecommendsView on HN
W
@WallyFunk2021 · in “Ask HN: How can I get better at original thinking and being creative?”
Watch Everything is a Remix: ▶ this video I've been prolific over the years in programming and art & code, and about 99% of it was remixes of others work. I'm not ashamed of that - many artists draw inspiration from multiple sources. The trick is to put your own spin on it, not directly rip off someone else's work. Many artists will never tell you they borrowed from various sources, because they think that would come across as unoriginal and merely copying others work, but have a few beers with an artist and suddenly they start sharing their secrets...
RecommendsView on HN
j
@jborichevskiy2020 · in “Radio Garden – Explore live radio by rotating the globe”
A wonderful video exploring this: Everything is a Remix ▶ this video
RecommendsView on HN
M
@Malfunction922020 · in “Everything is a Remix (2015) [video]”
Submitted the video to Hacker News.
RecommendsView on HN
m
@mtgx2018 · in “Senate passes copyright bill to end 140-year protection for old songs”
> it's to allow the creator to extract all the possible value from their work That may be why governments of the world keep passing copyright laws now and how they view copyright. But copyright was established as a "balance" between making it profitable for the author to create the work (read: not to extract billions of dollars out of a work) in order to benefit the public. The primary goal has always been to benefit the public, not the author. Also, one of the reasons why copyright should be finite and not have too long of a term is because no author has ever created anything - anything at all - from scratch. They themselves have built upon the work of others. This is why copyright is meant to be a system where one creates something upon something else, and then someone new can create something new upon that previous work, and so on. Copyright was meant to be a kickstarting mechanism for authors, not a rent-seeking one, which is how it's used today. If you still don't see this what I'm trying to say from my comment, I highly suggest you watch this video: ▶ this video
RecommendsView on HN
g
@guiambros2017 · in “Tesla’s Dangerous Sprint into the Future”
This discussion reminds me of the "Everything is a Remix" [1] documentary. We tend to look at the winners to explain history, even though in many cases multiple players were working on the same theories at the same time, and the likely outcome would have been exactly the same if the winners have not existed. Worth watching. [1] ▶ this video
RecommendsView on HN