Config 2024: In defense of an old pixel (Marcin Wichary, Director of Design, Figma) | Figma

39K views · 2 years ago · talk · evergreen

Marcin Wichary, Director of Design at Figma, gives a Config 2024 talk defending the old pixel. It is a design-history look at pixels and pixel fonts on screens.

HN people call it a brilliant presentation on pixel fonts and treat it as the thing to watch if the pixel and bitmap type interest you.

“The author has a brilliant presentation on pixel fonts”

4 comments from Hacker News

f
@flappyeagle2025 · in “The hardest working font in Manhattan”
The author has a brilliant presentation on pixel fonts ▶ this video
RecommendsView on HN
m
@memalign2024 · in “In defense of an old pixel [video]”
Submitted the video to Hacker News.
RecommendsView on HN
m
@msephton2024 · in “Config 2024: In defense of an old pixel [video]”
Submitted the video to Hacker News.
RecommendsView on HN
l
@latexr2025 · in “The hardest working font in Manhattan”
> I don’t mean this as a slight, but this has to be written by a post-millennial. You could’ve looked him up. He’s not hard to find and definitely not post-millennial. Design director at Figma and previously worked at Medium, Google, and Code for America. Started his master’s in the late 90s. link ▶ this video Even if he were, these types of generational comments are trite, like the “only 90s kids will get this” memes. It is naive to assume someone’s age from an opinion; the tapestry of human diversity is considerably more complex than that. > nothing about these letterforms were unusual or “ugly” to me as they were practically ubiquitous. Ubiquity has nothing to do with beauty. You can live with something all your life and still find it ugly. Or you can develop your taste and change your opinion. You can even have nuanced opinions. Like the author, who mentions liking the font after the initial reaction. He called this post “a love letter”. link Look at the length of the post—that is more research on the subject than most of us will ever do. Let’s perhaps give the benefit of the doubt that a long time professional with the passion to do this amount of research has some basis for their views which go beyond when they were born. > like how a modern reader might react to seeing a “long s” — ſ — for the first time. There are a plethora of reactions to that: “how strange”, “how intriguing”, “how beautiful”, … Most people don’t think every old thing they encounter for the first time is ugly.
CitesView on HN